Prove it! The Burden of Proof Game in Science vs. Pseudoscience Disputes

Philosophia 42 (2):487-502 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of burden of proof is used in a wide range of discourses, from philosophy to law, science, skepticism, and even in everyday reasoning. This paper provides an analysis of the proper deployment of burden of proof, focusing in particular on skeptical discussions of pseudoscience and the paranormal, where burden of proof assignments are most poignant and relatively clear-cut. We argue that burden of proof is often misapplied or used as a mere rhetorical gambit, with little appreciation of the underlying principles. The paper elaborates on an important distinction between evidential and prudential varieties of burdens of proof, which is cashed out in terms of Bayesian probabilities and error management theory. Finally, we explore the relationship between burden of proof and several (alleged) informal logical fallacies. This allows us to get a firmer grip on the concept and its applications in different domains, and also to clear up some confusions with regard to when exactly some fallacies (ad hominem, ad ignorantiam, and petitio principii) may or may not occur

Similar books and articles

Beweislastverteilung und Intuitionen in philosophischen Diskursen.Thorsten Sander - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (1):69-97.
Burden of Proof Rules in Social Criticism.Juha Räikkä - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):463-477.
Evidence, proof, and facts: a book of sources.Peter Murphy (ed.) - 2003 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Compatibilism and the burden of proof.Peter van Inwagen - 1980 - Analysis 40 (March):98-100.
A dialogical theory of presumption.Douglas Walton - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (2):209-243.
The weights of evidence.Dale A. Nance - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):pp. 267-281.
How should philosophy be clear? Loaded clarity, default clarity, and Adorno.Nicholas Joll - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (146):73–95.
A formal model of adjudication dialogues.Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):305-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-27

Downloads
11,551 (#284)

6 months
232 (#9,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Massimo Pigliucci
CUNY Graduate Center
Maarten Boudry
University of Ghent

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.

View all 38 references / Add more references