“If only” counterfactual thoughts about cooperative and uncooperative decisions in social dilemmas

Thinking and Reasoning 28 (2):193-225 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We examined how people think about how things could have turned out differently after they made a decision to cooperate or not in three social interactions: the Prisoner’s dilemma (Experiment 1), the Stag Hunt dilemma (Experiment 2), and the Chicken game (Experiment 3). We found that participants who took part in the game imagined the outcome would have been different if a different decision had been made by the other player, not themselves; they did so whether the outcome was good or bad for them, their own choice had been to cooperate or not, and the other player’s choice had been to cooperate or not. Participants who only read about a fictional protagonist’s game imagined changes outside the protagonist’s control (such as the other player’s decision) after a good outcome but within the protagonist’s control (such as the protagonist’s decision) after a bad outcome. The implications for theories of counterfactual thinking and moral decision-making are discussed.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Counterfactual Imagination as a Mental Tool for Innovation.Monika Chylińska - 2017 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 8 (T):241-253.
Semifactual ''even if'' thinking.Rachel McCloy & Ruth M. J. Byrne - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (1):41 – 67.
Alternatives in Framing and Decision Making.Bart Geurts - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (1):1-19.
Practical Guilt. [REVIEW]Peter Vallentyne - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (4):550-552.


Added to PP

12 (#974,459)

6 months
5 (#366,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?