Health Research Priority Setting: Do Grant Review Processes Reflect Ethical Principles?

Global Public Health (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most public and non-profit organisations that fund health research provide the majority of their funding in the form of grants. The calls for grant applications are often untargeted, such that a wide variety of applications may compete for the same funding. The grant review process therefore plays a critical role in determining how limited research resources are allocated. Despite this, little attention has been paid to whether grant review criteria align with widely endorsed ethical criteria for allocating health research resources. Here, we analyse the criteria and processes that ten of the largest public and non-profit research funders use to choose between competing grant applications. Our data suggest that research funders rarely instruct reviewers to consider disease burden or to prioritise research for sicker or more disadvantaged populations, and typically only include scientists in the review processes. This is liable to undermine efforts to link research funding to health needs.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development.C. A. Gericke - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):164-168.
Funding and Forums for ELSI Research: Who (or What) Is Setting the Agenda?Clair Morrissey & Rebecca Walker - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Primary Research 3 (3):41-50.
Peer review and innovation.Raymond Spier - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):99-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-18

Downloads
333 (#55,297)

6 months
90 (#40,826)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Millum
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Should health research funding be proportional to the burden of disease?Joseph Millum - 2023 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 22 (1):76-99.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references