Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):441-450 (1999)

Emmanuel Picavet
Université paris 1
Emmanuel, Bernard Picavet
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/004839319902900305
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Homo Donator Versus Homo Oeconomicus.Jacques T. Godbout - 2000 - In T. Vandevelde (ed.), Gifts and Interests. Peeters. pp. 32.
Zweifel am homo oeconomicus.Dirk Baecker - 1994 - Ethik Und Sozialwissenschaften 5 (1):13-15.
Homo Oeconomicus and His Class Mates.Fritz Machlup - 1970 - In Alfred Schutz & Maurice Alexander Natanson (eds.), Phenomenology and Social Reality. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. pp. 122--139.


Added to PP index

Total views
2 ( #1,454,056 of 2,520,899 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,899 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes