Matthew Pianalto
Eastern Kentucky University
Abstract In the ?Lecture on ethics?, Wittgenstein declares that ethical statements are essentially nonsense. He later told Friedrich Waismann that it is essential to ?speak for oneself? on ethical matters. These comments might be taken to suggest that Wittgenstein shared an emotivist view of ethics?that one can only speak for oneself because there is no truth in ethics, only expressions of opinion (or emotions). I argue that this assimilation of Wittgenstein to emotivist thought is deeply misguided, and rests upon a serious misunderstanding of what is implied by the nonsensicality of ethical claims on Wittgenstein's view. I develop a reading of Wittgenstein's remarks in the ?Lecture on ethics? on which ethical statements, despite their nonsensicality, reveal the perspective of the speaker. The purpose of ethical language is to elucidate a speaker's perspective. Such elucidations, and the perspectives they reveal, can be evaluated, criticized, and respected on principled grounds even if, as Wittgenstein insists, no ethical judgment can be (objectively) justified by any fact. I contrast Wittgenstein's comments on ethics with some comments made by Frank Ramsey (from the same period), which appear similar to Wittgenstein's remarks on value. Contra Ramsey's insistence that there is ?nothing to discuss? about (or within) ethics, a proper understanding of Wittgenstein's views does not commit us to passing over ethics in silence
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2011.575000
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Language, Truth and Logic.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1936 - London: V. Gollancz.
Essays in Quasi-Realism.Simon Blackburn - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Machines Cannot Be Moral.Robert Sparrow - 2021 - AI and Society:1-9.
Moral Modesty, Moral Judgment and Moral Advice. A Wittgensteinian Approach.Benjamin7 De Mesel - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (1):20-37.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Whose Ethics? Which Wittgenstein?Duncan Richter - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (3):323-342.
Ethics and Private Language.Duncan Richter - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (1):181-203.
Was Wittgenstein a Psychologist? (I).James Bogen - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):374-378.
The Moral Dimension of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Method.Chrysoula Gitsoulis - 2007 - Analysis and Metaphysics (Special Issue on Wittgenstein) 6:452-467.
A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Max Black - 1964 - Cambridge University Press.
The Ethical Residue of Language in Levinas and Early Wittgenstein.Søren Overgaard - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (2):223-249.
Wittgenstein's Ethical Thought.Yaniv Iczkovits - 2012 - Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Wittgenstein, Ethics and Basic Moral Certainty.Nigel Pleasants - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (3):241 – 267.
Ethics in the Light Of Wittgenstein.Stephen Mulhall - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (3):293-321.
Work on Oneself: Wittgenstein's Philosophical Psychology.Fergus Kerr - 2008 - Institute for the Psychological Sciences Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
89 ( #130,809 of 2,505,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,142 of 2,505,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes