Bribery, consent and prima facie duty: A rejoinder to Carson [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5):361 - 364 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Responding to my paper Bribery Tom Carson argues that bribe takers violate promisory obligations in a wider range of cases than I acknowledge and insists that bribe taking is prima facie wrong in all contexts. I argue that he is wrong on both counts.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,951

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bribery and implicit agreements: A reply to PhilipS.Thomas L. Carson - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):123 - 125.
Abstract of: "Toward a Theory of Bribery" [with Commentaries].John R. Danley, Kendall D'Andrade & Scott Turow - 1983 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3 (1):79 - 86.
Freedom first: On coercion and coercive offers.Pascal Brixel - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Bribery.Kendall D'Andrade - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):239 - 248.
Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. [REVIEW]James Edwin Mahon - 2011 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (1).
Causes of Demand for International Bribery.Edwin Moore Jr - 2007 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 12 (2):18-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#270,506)

6 months
5 (#876,395)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references