AbstractIn the present book, Pauline Phemister argues against traditional Anglo-American interpretations of Leibniz as an idealist who conceives ultimate reality as a plurality of mind-like immaterial beings and for whom physical bodies are ultimately unreal and our perceptions of them illusory. Re-reading the texts without the prior assumption of idealism allows the more material aspects of Leibniz's metaphysics to emerge. Leibniz is found to advance a synthesis of idealism and materialism. His ontology posits indivisible, living, animal-like corporeal substances as the real metaphysical constituents of the universe; his epistemology combines sense-experience and reason; and his ethics fuses confused perceptions and insensible appetites with distinct perceptions and rational choice. In the light of his sustained commitment to the reality of bodies, Phemister re-examines his dynamics, the doctrine of pre-established harmony and his views on freedom. The image of Leibniz as a rationalist philosopher who values activity and reason over passivity and sense-experience is replaced by the one of a philosopher who recognises that, in the created world, there can only be activity if there is also passivity; minds, souls and forms if there is also matter; good if there is evil; perfection if there is imperfection.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Du Châtelet on Freedom, Self-Motion, and Moral Necessity.Julia Jorati - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (2):255-280.
Presupposition, Aggregation, and Leibniz’s Argument for a Plurality of Substances.Richard T. W. Arthur - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:91-115.
The Structure of Leibnizian Simple Substances.John Whipple - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):379-410.
The Logic of Leibniz’s Borrowed Reality Argument.Stephen Puryear - 2020 - Philosophical Quarterly 70 (279):350-370.
Similar books and articles
Leibniz and the Natural World: Activity, Passivity, and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz's Philosophy (Review). [REVIEW]Michael Futch - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):162-163.
Leibniz’s Theory of Substance and His Metaphysics of the Incarnation.Maria Rosa Antognazza - 2015 - In Paul Lodge & T. W. C. Stoneham (eds.), Locke and Leibniz on Substance. Routledge. pp. 231-252.
The Organic Vs. The Living in the Light of Leibniz's Aristotelianisms.Enrico Pasini - 2011 - In Ohad Nachtomy & Justin E. H. Smith (eds.), Machines of Nature and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz. Springer. pp. 81-94.
Continuity or Discontinuity? Some Remarks on Leibniz’s Concepts of ‘Substantia Vivens‘ and ‘Organism‘.Antonio Nunziante - 2011 - In Ohad Nachtomy & Justin Smith (eds.), Machines of Nature and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz. springer.
Leibniz und die panpsychistische Deutung der Theorie der einfachen Substanzen.Andreas Blank - 2000 - Studia Leibnitiana 32 (1):117 - 125.
Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Metametaphysics: Idealism, Realism, and the Nature of Substance.Brandon C. Look - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (11):871-879.
Leibniz and the Puzzle of Incompossibility: The Packing Strategy.Jeffrey K. McDonough - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (2):135-163.