Are mind body relations natural and intelligible? Some early modern perspectives

In Keith Allen & Tom Stoneham (eds.), Causation and Modern Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 87-103 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mysterious Mixtures: Descartes on Mind and Body.Richard Davies - 2015 - Journal of Early Modern Studies 4 (1):47-78.
Mind-body, body-mind: Two distinct problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Select works of Porphyry. Porphyry - 1823 - Frome, Somerset, UK: Prometheus Trust. Edited by Thomas Taylor.
Cudworth on Mind, Body, and Plastic Nature.Keith Allen - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (4):337-347.
Historical origins of the modern mind/body split.R. E. Lind - 2001 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (1):23-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-05

Downloads
1 (#1,841,214)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pauline Phemister
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Why Leibniz Should Have Agreed with Berkeley about Abstract Ideas.Stephen Puryear - 2021 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29 (6):1054-1071.
Leibniz on Sensation and the Limits of Reason.Walter Ott - 2016 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 33 (2):135-153.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references