What society can and cannot learn from coherence: theoretical and practical considerations

In Hiroshi Yama & Véronique Salvano-Pardieu (eds.), Adapting Human Thinking and Moral Reasoning in Contemporary Society. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, Information Science Reference. pp. 176-198 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Society is facing uncertainty on a multitude of domains and levels: usually, reasoning and decisions about political, economic, or health issues must be made under uncertainty. Among various approaches to probability, this chapter presents the coherence approach to probability as a method for uncertainty management. The authors explain the role of uncertainty in the context of important societal issues like legal reasoning and vaccination hesitancy. Finally, the chapter presents selected psychological factors which impact probabilistic representation and reasoning and discusses what society can and cannot learn from the coherence approach from theoretical and practical perspectives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Coherence of de Finetti coherence.Daniele Mundici - 2017 - Synthese 194 (10):4055-4063.
Implications of the Dutch Book: Following Ramsey’s axioms.Wei Xiong - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):334-344.
Hidden Assumptions in the Dutch Book Argument.C. Waidacher - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (3):293-312.
Is there a dutch book argument for probability kinematics?Brad Armendt - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):583-588.
A mistake in dynamic coherence arguments?Brian Skyrms - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):320-328.
De finetti, countable additivity, consistency and coherence.Colin Howson - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (1):1-23.
The arguments from coherence: Analysis and evaluation.Bertea Stefano - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (3):369-391.
Why be coherent?Glauber De Bona & Julia Staffel - 2018 - Analysis 78 (3):405-415.
On the Truth-Conduciveness of Coherence.William Roche - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S3):647-665.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-01

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Niki Pfeifer
Universität Regensburg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations