Duration Enough for Presentism

Axiomathes 30 (4):391-421 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper considers a problem for dynamic presentism that has received little attention: its apparent inability to accommodate the duration of events (such as conscious experiences). After outlining the problem, I defend presentism from it. This defence proceeds in two stages. First, I argue the objection rests on a faulty assumption: that duration is temporal extension. The paper challenges that assumption on several different ways of conceiving of temporal extension. This is the negative case and forms the bulk of the paper. Second, after diagnosing the error leading to the identification of duration with temporal extension, I outline a new presentist-friendly account of duration that avoids the problem. In particular, a non-reductive account of duration is offered that treats it as a primitive quality which bestows its possessor with a certain modal quality: that the possessor potentially does not change whilst there are changes in its environs. This is the positive case. Together the positive and negative cases provide presentism with an interesting and novel way of overcoming the problem of duration.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Presentism and consciousness.Neil McKinnon - 2003 - Australian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):305-323.
Presentism and Causation Revisited.Sam Baron - 2012 - Philosophical Papers 41 (1):1-21.
Characterizing Presentism.McKinnon Neil - 2013 - In Roberto Ciuni, Kristie Miller & Giuliano Torrengo (eds.), New Papers on the Present: Focus on Presentism. Munich: Philosophia Verlag. pp. 13-30.
Demarcating presentism.Christian Wuthrich - 2010 - In Henk de Regt, Samir Okasha & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 441--450.
A foundation for presentism.Robert E. Pezet - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5):1809–1837.
Presentism and Grounding Past Truths.Matthew Davidson - 2013 - In Roberto Ciuni, Giuliano Torrengo & Kristie Miller (eds.), New Papers on the Present: Focus on Presentism. Verlag. pp. 153-172.
Liberated Presentism.Michael B. Burke - 2020 - Review of Metaphysics 73 (March):569-603.
Time for presence?Jonathan Tallant - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (2):271-280.
Finding satisfaction in presentism.Robert E. Pezet - 2020 - Synthese 197 (10):4519-4531.
Defining Existence Presentism.Jonathan Charles Tallant - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S3):479-501.
On Presentism, Endurance, and Change.H. Scott Hestevold And William R. Carter - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):491-510.
A defense of presentism in a relativistic setting.Mark Hinchliff - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):586.
How to endure presentism.Sam Baron - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (6):659-673.


Added to PP

78 (#199,436)

6 months
8 (#187,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Dead Past Dilemma.Robert E. Pezet - 2022 - Metaphysica 23 (1):51-72.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Cambridge, England: Allen & Unwin.
Four Dimensionalism.Theodore Sider - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
The unreality of time.John Ellis McTaggart - 1908 - Mind 17 (68):457-474.
A World of States of Affairs.D. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:429-440.

View all 118 references / Add more references