Rights, Reasons, and Religious Conflict

Social Philosophy Today 21:81-93 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The role of religious commitments in John Rawls’s version of political liberalism has drawn frequent criticism. Some of the critics have complained that it fails to respect those with deep religious commitments by excluding explicitly religious reasons from debate about fundamental issues of justice. Others criticize the exclusion of religious reasons on the ground that it is unnecessary. Political liberalism, they argue, can accommodate appeals to religious reasons. For critics of both stripes, Jürgen Habermas and Thomas Scanlon should seem a welcome alternative. They offer ways of justifying claims of justice and of legitimating political arrangements that do not appear to exclude religious reasons at the outset but still yield liberal polities. In this paper, I argue that Habermas’s and Scanlon’s theoretical frameworks are not only open to religious reasons, they require the inclusion of religious reasons in deliberations about the just ordering of public life. I then explain why such an arrangement is desirable. I close with a look at the limits of Habermas’s and Scanlon’s ability to accommodate religiousreasons in public deliberation, suggesting that their improvements on Rawls are smaller than they at first appear.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Highest Authority.Zachary Hoskins - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (3):393-412.
Religious reasons and public policy.John Chandler - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):137-152.
First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology.Linda Zagzebski - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):285 - 304.
Religious conviction in the profession of arms.Christopher J. Eberle & Rick Rubel - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (3):171-185.
Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement.Kevin Vallier - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):366-389.
Liberal exclusions and foundationalism.Michael R. DePaul - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):103-120.
Reasons and Religious Belief.Patrick Lee - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):19-34.


Added to PP

51 (#314,334)

6 months
6 (#530,615)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Glen Pettigrove
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references