Peer review: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

&
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):747-750 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00046057

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
Beauty.James Kirwan - 1999 - New York, NY, USA: Distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin's Press.
Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder?John Hyman - 2002 - Think 1 (1):81-92.
Peer-review research: Objections and obligations.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):246-255.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Peer-to-peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority.Kathleen Fitzpatrick - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (3):161-179.
A Transformed Beholder. Objective Beauty as the Impetus for Sanctification in the Theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar.Sam Wellbaum - 2012 - Perichoresis 10 (2):245-265.
Promoting F.A.I.T.h. In Peer review: Five core attributes of effective Peer review. [REVIEW]Leigh Turner - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Appendix. Comparing peer review and information prizes: A possible economics experiment.Robin Hanson - 1995 - Social Epistemology 9 (1):49-55.
Beauty.Roger Scruton - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Reliability of “the eye of the beholder”: Effects of sex of the beholder and sex of the beheld.Norbert L. Kerr & Susan Turner Kurtz - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (3):179-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
19 (#781,160)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is the source of bias in peer review?Ray Over - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):229-230.
Overconfidence in ignorant experts.James V. Bradley - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (2):82-84.
Reforming peer review: From recycling to reflexivity.Daryl E. Chubin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):204-204.
On the failure to detect previously published research.Donald deB Beaver - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):199-200.

View all 6 references / Add more references