Zygon 38 (2):333-354 (2003)
Abstract |
Much good work has been done on the evolution of human morality by focusing on how “selfish genes‘ can give rise to altruistic human beings. A richer research program is needed, however, to take into account the ambivalence of naturally evolved biopsychological motivators and the historical pluralism of human morality in religious systems. Such a program is described here. A first step is to distinguish the ultimate cause of natural selection from proximate causes that are the results of natural selection. Next, some proximate causes are suggested as possible conditions of biological and emotional valuing as well as of customary social morality and individual rational ethical thought. Finally, different moral perspectives of Confucianism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Christianity are briefly presented in order to illustrate how one might inquire about the selection of a variety of biopsychological and cultural proximate causes that enable the evolution of a plurality of religious moral systems
|
Keywords | valuing |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/1467-9744.00503 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.Edward O. Wilson - 1975 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):577-584.
Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals.Frans de Waal - 1996 - Harvard University Press.
View all 18 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Beyond the Sociobiological Dilemma: Social Emotions and the Evolution of Morality.Alejandro Rosas - 2007 - Zygon 42 (3):685-700.
Evolution and Ethics: Human Morality in Biological and Religious Perspective.Philip Clayton & Jeffrey Schloss (eds.) - 2004 - Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co..
Morality and Evolution by Group Selection.Michael Byron - 1999 - Http://Www.Bu.Edu/Wcp/Papers/TEth/TEthByro.Htm.
Evolution, Animals, and the Basis of Morality.Colin McGinn - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):81 – 99.
Darwinian Evolutionary Ethics: Between Patriotism and Sympathy.Peter J. Richerson & Robert Boyd - 2004 - In Phillip Clayton & Jeffrey Schloss (eds.), Evolution and Ethics: Human Morality in Biological and Religious Perspective. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.. pp. 50--77.
What the Biological Sciences Can and Cannot Contribute to Ethics.Francisco Ayala - 2008 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-02
Total views
199 ( #59,473 of 2,519,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,871 )
2010-09-02
Total views
199 ( #59,473 of 2,519,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,871 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads