Non-consequentialism and Political Philosophy

Enfoques 18 (1-2):27-49 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Robert Nozick has shown in which ways the theory of natural law (in John Locke, for instance) can be invoked to defend a libertarian theory of State. This paper suggests that Nozick does not prove that invoking natural rights may be a proof against the consequentionalist challenge. An overview of no..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consequentialism and its critics.Samuel Scheffler (ed.) - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Squirrel and the State.Nicolas Maloberti - 2010 - The Independent Review 14 (3):377-387.
Is Rule-Consequentialism a Rubber Duck?Brad Hooker - 1994 - Analysis 54 (2):92 - 97.
The demands of consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Feser on Nozick. [REVIEW]Peter Jaworski - 2005 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (1):181-187.
Kant’s Neglected Argument Against Consequentialism.Gilbert Plumer - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):501-520.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
19 (#683,238)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Pettit
Australian National University

Citations of this work

Anti-paternalism and Public Health Policy.Kalle Grill - 2009 - Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references