Minimal Consequentialism

Philosophy 70 (273):313 - 339 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I propose to set out, and argue for, a theory of what makes acts morally permissible. The claims about morality that I shall be advancing will be minimalist. By this I mean that the scope of the theory will be restricted to as small a class of acts or courses of action as possible, and its bearing on the members of that class to as narrow a range of characteristics as possible. My starting point is that, as Dostoevsky put it, 'everything is permitted'– unless there prove to be good reasons why it cannot be

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
13 (#978,482)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Caws
George Washington University

Citations of this work

Rule-Consequentialism's Assumptions.Kevin P. Tobia - 2018 - Utilitas 30 (4):458-471.
Ethical relationships in the teaching profession in Slovakia.Marta Gluchmanova - 2016 - Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology 6 (2):1-20.
The Moral Oracle’s Test.Sven Ove Hansson - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):643-651.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Consequences of consequentialism.David Sosa - 1993 - Mind 102 (405):101-122.
Elbow-Room for Consequentialists.Frances Howard-Snyder - 1992 - Analysis 52 (4):249 - 253.
Right and Wrong. [REVIEW]Peter Caws & Charles Fried - 1978 - Hastings Center Report 8 (6):43.

Add more references