Freedom in belief and desire

Journal of Philosophy 93 (9):429-449 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

People ordinarily suppose that there are certain things they ought to believe and certain things they ought not to believe. In supposing this to be so, they make corresponding assumptions about their belief-forming capacities. They assume that they are generally responsive to what they think they ought to believe in the things they actually come to believe. In much the same sense, people ordinarily suppose that there are certain things they ought to desire and do and they make corresponding assumptions about their capacities to form desires and act on them. We chart these assumptions and argue that they entail that people are responsible and free on two fronts: they are free and responsible believers and free and responsible desirers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explaining expressions of emotion.Peter Goldie - 2000 - Mind 109 (433):25-38.
Backgrounding desire.Philip Pettit & Michael Smith - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (4):565-592.
Folk belief and commonplace belief.Frank Jackson & Philip Pettit - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (2):298-305.
Nonbelief and the desire-as-belief thesis.Charles B. Cross - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (2):115-124.
Freedom and desire.Wright Neely - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (September):32-54.
Freedom Of The Individual.Stuart Hampshire - 1965 - Princeton, N.J.: Harper & Row.
Belief and freedom of mind.Christopher Hookway - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):195 – 204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
329 (#58,945)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Smith
Princeton University

Citations of this work

A puzzle about epistemic akrasia.Daniel Greco - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):201-219.
Doxastic Responsibility.Neil Levy - 2007 - Synthese 155 (1):127-155.
Active belief.Matthew Boyle - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary 35 (S1):119-147.
Epistemic responsibility and doxastic agency.Conor McHugh - 2013 - Philosophical Issues 23 (1):132-157.

View all 66 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references