Bayesian methodology: Some criticisms answered

Ratio 4 (2):170-184 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pollock on probability in epistemology. [REVIEW]Branden Fitelson - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):455 - 465.
Election predictions: Reply.Herbert A. Simon - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):361 – 364.
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
Ramsey and the measurement of belief.Richard Bradley - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
42 (#332,036)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Urbach
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Philosophical papers.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science.Peter Urbach - 1989 - Philosophical Quarterly 39 (156):357-360.

View all 7 references / Add more references