A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes

Consciousness and Cognition 22 (2):654-669 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The well-known experiments of Nisbett and Wilson lead to the conclusion that we have no introspective access to our decision-making processes. Johansson et al. have recently developed an original protocol consisting in manipulating covertly the relationship between the subjects’ intended choice and the outcome they were presented with: in 79.6% of cases, they do not detect the manipulation and provide an explanation of the choice they did not make, confirming the findings of Nisbett and Wilson. We have reproduced this protocol, while introducing for some choices an expert guidance to the description of this choice. The subjects who were assisted detected the manipulation in 80% of cases. Our experiment confirms Nisbett and Wilson’s findings that we are usually unaware of our decision processes, but goes further by showing that we can access them through specific mental acts

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metacognition without introspection.Peter Langland-Hassan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):151-152.
Access Internalism.George Pappas - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):159-169.
Affective ignorance.Christoph Jäger - 2009 - Erkenntnis 71 (1):123 - 139.
Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9.
Eluding Wilson’s “Elusive Narrators”.David Davies - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):387 - 394.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-15

Downloads
56 (#279,626)

6 months
14 (#168,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Shirley Thomas
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California