The momentariness of simples

Philosophy 79 (3):435-445 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many philosophers have supposed that while most of the objects in our immediate experience are composed of parts, at some point we must come down to those fundamental impartite objects out of which all partite things are composed: the metaphysical simples (usually conceived of as enduring, even eternal, entities). I consider what reason we have to believe that there really are simples, then we also have good reason to believe in their momentariness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Zeno objects and supervenience.Simon Prosser - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):18 - 26.
Extended simples.Kris McDaniel - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):131 - 141.
Conceiving simple experiences.Michael V. Antony - 2001 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (3):263-86.
Constituted simples?Jens Johansson - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (1):87-89.
Descartes' compositional theory of mental representation.David Landy - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):214-231.
Sider, Hawley, Sider and the Vagueness Argument.Nikk Effingham - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):241 - 250.
Simples and the possibility of discrete space.Neal A. Tognazzini - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):117 – 128.
A tale of two simples.Joshua Spencer - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (2):167 - 181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
101 (#168,750)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roy Perrett
Australian National University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references