The Motion of Intellect On the Neoplatonic Reading of Sophist 248e-249d
International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 8 (2):135-160 (2014)
Abstract
This paper defends Plotinus’ reading ofSophist248e-249d as an expression of the togetherness or unity-in-duality of intellect and intelligible being. Throughout the dialogues Plato consistently presents knowledge as a togetherness of knower and known, expressing this through the myth of recollection and through metaphors of grasping, eating, and sexual union. He indicates that an intelligible paradigm is in the thought that apprehends it, and regularly regards the forms not as extrinsic “objects” but as the contents of living intelligence. A meticulous reading ofSophist248e-249d shows that the “motion” attributed to intelligible being is not temporal change but the activity of intellectual apprehension. Aristotle’s doctrines of knowledge as identity of intellect and the intelligible, and of divine intellect as thinking itself, are therefore in continuity with Plato, and Plotinus’ doctrine of intellect and being is continuous with both Plato and Aristotle.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1163/18725473-12341285
My notes
Similar books and articles
De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu: Plotin critique d'Aristote.Marilena Vlad - 2007 - Chôra 5:121-139.
Apprehension of Thought in Ennead 4.3.30.D. M. Hutchinson - 2011 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (2):262-282.
Plotinus and Aristotle on the Simplicity of the Divine Intellect.Jonathan Greig - 2013 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
The Good of the Intellect.Eric D. Perl - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:25-39.
Aristotle’s Immortal Intellect.Mark Amorose - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:97-106.
Colloquium 1: The Togetherness of Thought and Being: A Phenomenological Reading of Plotinus’ Doctrine “That the Intelligibles are Not Outside the Intellect”.Eric Perl - 2007 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 22 (1):1-40.
Plato’s Reply to the 'Worst Difficulty’ Argument of the Parmenides: Sophist 248a — 249d.Mark L. Mcpherran - 1986 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (3):233-252.
Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur Enneas VI.7.32 et 33.Suzanne Stern-Gillet - 2000 - Phronesis 45 (1):38-63.
Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur Enneas VI.7.32 et 33.Suzanne Stern-Gillet - 2000 - Phronesis 45 (1):38 - 63.
The Place of Intellect in Aristotle.Kurt Pritzl - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:57-75.
‘Obviously all this Agrees with my Will and my Intellect’: Schopenhauer on Active and PassiveNousin Aristotle'sDe Animaiii.5.Mor Segev - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):535-556.
Más allá de Aristóteles: un análisis metafísico del entendimiento.David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2009 - In Alfonso Pérez de Laborda (ed.), El Dios de Aristóteles. Νόησις Νόησεως. Ediciones de la Facultad de Teología San Dámaso. pp. 345-366.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-01-31
Downloads
37 (#317,909)
6 months
12 (#78,019)
2015-01-31
Downloads
37 (#317,909)
6 months
12 (#78,019)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Argument against the Friends of the Forms Revisited: Sophist 248a4–249d5.Michael Wiitala - 2018 - Apeiron 51 (2):171-200.
The possibility of reading the Plotinian noetic thought as non-predicative.Robert Brenner Barreto da Silva - 2020 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 30:03036-03036.
References found in this work
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 86 (4):562-563.