- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Summary of Unfit for the Future
Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):338-339 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral EnhancementBy Ingmar Persson And Julian Savulescu.R. Joyce - 2013 - Analysis 73 (3):587-589.
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement, by Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu.Richard Joyce - 2013 - Analysis 73 (3):587-589.
Unfit for the Future? Human Nature, Scientific Progress, and the Need for Moral Enhancement.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 486–500.
Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):348-352.
On the need of moral enhancement. A critical comment of “Unfit for the future” of I. Persson and J. Savulescu.Jose Luis Peres Triviño - 2013 - Dilemata 12:261-269.
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement.S. Cordell - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (255):330-332.
Savulescu's objections to the future of value argument.Don Marquis - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):119-122.
Moral Enhancement, Freedom, and the God Machine.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - The Monist 95 (3):399-421.
McMahan on the withdrawal of life‐prolonging aid.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2005 - Philosophical Books 46 (1):11-22.
Should moral bioenhancement be compulsory? Reply to Vojin Rakic.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):251-252.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-17
Downloads
50 (#293,949)
6 months
8 (#209,681)
2013-12-17
Downloads
50 (#293,949)
6 months
8 (#209,681)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Psychedelic Moral Enhancement.Brian D. Earp - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:415-439.
The Role of Emotion Modulation in Moral Bioenhancement Debate.Karolina Kudlek - 2019 - Topoi 38 (1):113-123.
The ethical desirability of moral bioenhancement: a review of reasons. [REVIEW]Jona Specker, Farah Focquaert, Kasper Raus, Sigrid Sterckx & Maartje Schermer - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):67.
Towards a systematic evaluation of moral bioenhancement.Karolina Kudlek - 2022 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 43 (2-3):95-110.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-67c5d994d4-h99d7 uwo