Reflections on the transnational and comparative imperial history of Asia: Its promises, perils, and prospects

Thesis Eleven 139 (1):129-144 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two prominent approaches to the history of empires and nation-states are comparative imperial history [CIH] and transnational history [TNH]. Each group of historians has actively promoted their perspective, but the two have had little interaction. Furthermore, in the history of East Asia, nationalist perspectives have dominated over transnational approaches until very recent times. This article points to new studies that examine Chinese imperial and national history from transnational and comparative perspectives, and encourages further work, including an ecological and environmental viewpoint, that will foster this trend.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transnationalism and the New Religio-politics.Jeremy Stolow - 2004 - Theory, Culture and Society 21 (2):109-137.
Imperial Nomads. A History of Central Asia, 500-1500.Denis Sinor & Luc Kwanten - 1982 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 102 (1):240.
A deliberative approach to Northeast Asia's contested history.Baogang He & David Hundt - 2012 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 13 (1):37-58.
Of the Constant Superiority of Shanghai as a Financial Centre to Develop in East Asia.Jia Du - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:62-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-18

Downloads
11 (#1,110,001)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Production of Space.Henri Lefebvre - 1991 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Telling the trugh about history.Joyce Appleby, Lynn Hunt & Margaret Jacob - 1995 - History and Theory 34 (4):320-339.
The Myth of Japanese Uniqueness.Van C. Gessel & Peter N. Dale - 1988 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 108 (4):654.

Add more references