Review of The Myth of the Framework and Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem [Book Review]

New Scientist (10th Dec) (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The myth of the framework, as Popper explains it, is the idea that a rational and fruitful discussion is impossible unless the participants share a common framework of basic assumptions or, at least, unless they have agreed on such a framework for the purposes of the discussion. Popper admits that understanding another mind or language max' be difficult, but if there is a desire to understand another person's aims and problems you can bridge the gap.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Showing in Argumentation.Geert-Leuke Lueken - 1997 - Philosophical Investigations 20 (3):205-223.
Mind-body, body-mind: Two distinct problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Reductionism in Exile?Dieter Sturma - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 54 (1):71-87.
Can we solve the mind-body problem?Colin McGinn - 1989 - Mind 98 (July):349-66.
The mind-brain problem.Peter Slezak - 2000 - In Evian Gordon (ed.), Integrative Neuroscience. Harwood Academic Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-07

Downloads
202 (#94,868)

6 months
54 (#76,058)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ray Scott Percival
London School of Economics (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references