Rethinking Local Institutional Review Board (IRB) Review at State Health Departments: Implications for a Consolidated, Independent Public Health IRB

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):997-1007 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of unique problems plague human research protection efforts at United States (U.S.) State and Territorial Departments of Health (DOHs) problems which might be ameliorated through a consolidated national or regional, independent, not-for-profit Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00727.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Protecting the navajo people through tribal regulation of research.Doug Brugge & Mariam Missaghian - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):491-507.
'Through a glass darkly' - the Rockefeller foundation's international health board and soviet public health.S. Solomon - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (3):409-418.
U.S. Federal Regulations for Emergency Research: A Practical Guide and Commentary.Andrew McRae & Charles Weijer - unknown
Us irbs confronting research in the developing world.Robert L. Klitzman - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (2):63-73.
Human participants challenges in youth tobacco cessation research: Researchers' perspectives.Kathleen R. Diviak, Susan J. Curry, Sherry L. Emery & Robin J. Mermelstein - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):321 – 334.
A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005.Anne Rowan-Legg, Charles Weijer, J. Gao & C. Fernandez - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):74-78.
Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: Institutional review of research in work organizations.Daniel R. Ilgen & Bradford S. Bell - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (4):395 – 412.
Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: Where should we go from here'.Raymond De Vries, Debra A. DeBruin & Andrew Goodgame - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):351 – 368.
The evaluation of the risks and benefits of phase II cancer clinical trials by institutional review board (IRB) members: a case study.H. E. M. van Luijn - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):170-176.
Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research.Daryl Pullman - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):523 – 545.
Exempting All Minimal-Risk Research from IRB Review: Pruning or Poisoning the Regulatory Tree?Mahesh Ananth & Mike Scheessele - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (2):9-14.
Social and behavioral researchers' experiences with their irbs.Mark H. Ashcraft & Jeremy A. Krause - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (1):1 – 17.
Using the brain dead for medical research.Susan R. Martyn - unknown
Human participants challenges in youth-focused research: Perspectives and practices of IRB administrators.Diane K. Wagener, Amy K. Sporer, Mary Simmerling, Jennifer L. Flome, Christina An & Susan J. Curry - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):335 – 349.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
27 (#554,860)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Heroes in Bioethics.Françoise Baylis - 2000 - Hastings Center Report 30 (3):34-39.
Heroes in Bioethics.Françoise Baylis - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 30 (3):34-39.

View all 9 references / Add more references