Rhetoric and scientific controversies

In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 50 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Scientific controversies: An introduction.P. Machamer, M. Pera & A. Baltas - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 3--17.
Scientific controversies: philosophical and historical perspectives.Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Scientific discourse and the rhetoric of globalization: the impact of culture and language.Carmen Pérez-Llantada - 2012 - New York: Continuum.
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of Dascal's view of scientific controversies.Kanavillil Rajagopalan - 2002 - Manuscrito 25 (2):433-464.
On the Cognitive Analysis o f Scientific Controversies.Richard E. Grandy - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 67.
Classifying scientific controversies.Aristides Baltas - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 40.
Patterns of scientific controversies.Philip Kitcher - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 21.
Persuading science: the art of scientific rhetoric.Marcello Pera & William R. Shea (eds.) - 1991 - Canton, MA: Science History Publications, USA.
Counterfeit scientific controversies in science policy contexts.Martin Weinel - unknown
The Public Dimension Of Scientific Controversies.Jeanine Czubaroff - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (1):51-74.
Structure and Scientific Controversies.William Goodwin - 2013 - Topoi 32 (1):101-110.
Structure and Scientific Controversies.William Goodwin - 2013 - Topoi 32 (1):101-110.
Controversies and the Becomin g of Physical Chemistry.Kostas Gavroglu - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 177.
Multiple Personalities, Internal Controversies, and Invisible Marvels.Ian Hacking - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 213.
Are scientific papers examples of rhetoric?: Commentary on “Rhetoric, technical writing, and ethics”.Frederick Grinnell - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):487-488.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
32 (#483,225)

6 months
7 (#411,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcello Pera
University of Pisa

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references