In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-74 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Legitimate political authority is often said to involve a “right to rule,” which is most plausibly understood as a Hohfeldian moral power on the part of the state to impose obligations on its subjects (or otherwise to change their normative situation). Many writers have taken the state’s moral power (if and when it exists) to be a correlate, in some sense, of an obligation on the part of the state’s subjects to obey its directives. Thus legitimate political authority is said to entail a general obligation to obey the law, and a general obligation to obey the law is said to entail legitimate political authority. With some version of this idea in mind, many writers attempt to establish full (or partial) legitimate political authority by first arguing for the intermediate conclusion that there exists a general (or partial) obligation to obey the law. This article argues that such a strategy is fundamentally mistaken, because while legitimate authority does indeed entail an obligation to obey the law, an obligation to obey the law does not, in and of itself, entail legitimate authority. This can be referred to as “the reverse entailment problem.” To avoid this problem, a theory of political authority must argue directly for the existence of the appropriate kind of moral power on the part of the state. This article argues for the “value-based” conception of a moral power, which states, very roughly, that one person holds a power over another if there is sufficient value in the former possessing the capacity intentionally to impose an obligation on the latter (or otherwise to change her normative situation). This seemingly simple understanding of a moral power gives rise to surprisingly strong adequacy conditions on what can count as an acceptable theory of legitimate political authority, and these conditions decisively rule out most of the standard theories in the literature
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics.Joseph Raz - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law.William A. Edmundson - 2004 - Legal Theory 10 (4):215–259.
View all 7 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Norm and Object: A Normative Hylomorphic Theory of Social Objects.Asya Passinsky - 2021 - Philosophers' Imprint 21 (25):1-21.
The Relevance of Coercion: Some Preliminaries.Nicos Stavropoulos - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (3):339-358.
View all 13 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Legitimate Authority Without Political Obligation.William A. Edmundson - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (1):43 - 60.
Political Authority, Moral Powers and the Intrinsic Value of Obedience.William A. Edmundson - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):179-191.
Rethinking Political Obligation: Moral Principles, Communal Ties, Citizenship.Dorota Mokrosinska - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Because I Said So.William A. Edmundson - 2013 - Problema: Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría Del Derecho 7:41-61.
Surrender of Judgment and the Consent Theory of Political Authority.Mark C. Murphy - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (2):115 - 143.
A Philosophical Theory of Citizenship: Obligation, Authority, and Membership.Steven J. Wulf - 2008 - Lexington Books.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-12-06
Total views
65 ( #176,106 of 2,506,076 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,076 )
2013-12-06
Total views
65 ( #176,106 of 2,506,076 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,076 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads