Manchester Terrorist: Politics, not Religion

Abstract

It is facile and factually incorrect to represent suicide terrorists as simply seeking mass destruction, as demented or believing that they will be rewarded by "seventy-two virgins in paradise". In my book The Myth of the Closed Mind: Understanding How and Why People are Rational I felt it was important to deal with the issue of terrorism by consulting explanatory theories of human behaviour and the substantial research on the strategic pattern of terrorist incidents over the decades, led principally by Professor Robert Pape of Chicago University. To defeat your enemy, you must first understand him. Strangely, we must first grant that, though morally depraved, terrorists are rational: they concoct and execute detailed plans with definite strategic goals in mind. Only once we have granted the terrorist a rational mind can we, in the end, create peace. My argument is that while religion may have a small role in terrorism, it is principally politics, or the logic of territorial control, that is the key to understanding the threat we face. This extract from my book is principally about Al Qaeda, but a similar analysis applies to ISIS, the current greatest threat to our peace in the west. The strategic goal of Al Qaeda was simply to repulse what they saw as foreign intervention. ISIS has the same goal, but in order to continue its growth as a state in the sense of a monopoly of coercion over a given geographical area. ISIS, a rogue state that arose in ungoverned space created unintentionally by foreign intervention in Iraq, is now lashing out at foreign governments that have severely shrunk the territory ISIS occupies. Before October 2015, ISIS confined its terrorism to the goal of extending its territory in Iraq and Syria, and there were no significant ISIS-led or inspired suicide terrorist attacks outside Iraq and Syria. But now, as their territory collapses, they are attacking the countries that have strangled their control of territory in Iraq and Syria: the coalition of western governments – Britain, Belgium, Canada, France, Morocco, Turkey, Russia, the U.S.A. and others – exactly the countries that have recently seen an explosion of suicide terrorism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On the So‐Called War on Terrorism.Tom Rockmore - 2004 - Metaphilosophy 35 (3):386-401.
Understanding Anti-Terrorism Legislation.Michael Giudice - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:17-21.
The Political Economy of Terrorism.Walter Enders & Todd Sandler - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Terrorism and the Root Causes Argument.Alistair M. Macleod - 2004 - Social Philosophy Today 20:97-108.
Terrorism, war, and peace.Jürgen Stolzenber - 2006 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 5 (1):67–79.
Terrorism, Retribution, and Collective Responsibility.Mark R. Reiff - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (2):209-242.
Terrorism and the Root Causes Argument.Alistair M. Macleod - 2004 - Social Philosophy Today 20:97-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-25

Downloads
231 (#84,276)

6 months
54 (#77,515)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ray Scott Percival
London School of Economics (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references