Common Knowledge 19 (3):411-423 (2013)

Authors
Andrew J. Nicholson
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Abstract
This essay, by the editor of Common Knowledge, introduces the sixth and final installment of “Fuzzy Studies,” the journal's “Symposium on the Consequence of Blur.” Suggesting that “Fuzzy Studies” should be understood in the context of a desultory campaign against zeal conducted in the journal for almost twenty years, he explains that the editors' assumption has been that any authentic case for the less adamant modes of thinking, or the less focused ways of seeing, needs to be unenthusiastic and carefully ramified. To establish the distinction between overenthused and unemphatic approaches to blur, he contrasts the ecstatically amorphous “Blur building” with examples of classical Chinese landscape painting. Elizabeth Diller and Richard Scofidio, in their book blur: the making of nothing, chronicle the development of their plans for the Blur building and, in the process, inadvertently show that, to overbear various negative associations of blur and fog, the authors/architects grew self-contradictorily emphatic about the need to produce de-emphasis in architecture and in modern life. Perl shows how this self-contradiction appears also in phenomenology-inflected writings on blur by T. J. Clark, Yve-Alain Bois and Rosalind Kraus, J.-P. Sartre, and Georges Bataille, but not in the work of the phenomenologist François Jullien, whose book The Great Image Has No Form analyzes the role of blur in classical Chinese art theory and practice. Where traditional Western painting, Jullien argues, calls for voyeuristically intense focus, traditional Chinese painting stimulates “dé-tente, relaxation or ‘untensing’.” Intense focus on a blur is still, Perl observes, an intense focus. In describing a painting by the Yuan Dynasty master Ni Zan, Perl concludes that the only way to be un-self-contradictorily positive about fuzziness, whether in logic or aesthetics, is to de-reify and de-differentiate with the aim of achieving blandness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/0961754x-2281756
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Introduction: Bland Blur.Jeffrey M. Perl - 2013 - Common Knowledge 19 (3):411-423.
Graded Consequence Relations and Fuzzy Closure Operator.Giangiacomo Gerla - 1996 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 6 (4):369-379.
Introduction: The Inchoative Moment.Robin Wagner-Pacifici - 2013 - Common Knowledge 19 (1):28-39.
Ghostlier Demarcations.Michael D. Jackson - 2013 - Common Knowledge 19 (1):96-110.
A Type of Fuzzy Ring.Hacı Aktaş & Naim Çağman - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (3-4):165-177.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-23

Total views
25 ( #457,965 of 2,518,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes