Commercial Interests, the Technological Imperative, and Advocates: Three Forces Driving Genomic Sequencing in Newborns

Hastings Center Report 48 (S2):43-44 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the NSIGHT program was driven by a desire to define and gather data about both the benefits and harms of introducing genomic sequencing into the care of newborns, it remains to be seen how much influence these data will have in shaping the use of this technology in newborns. Ultimately, three additional forces—commercial interests, the technological imperative, and advocates—may play a significant role in shaping the use of sequencing in newborns. Policy‐makers and clinicians should be aware of the effects of these additional forces when considering the appropriate use of this technology in clinical practice and public health screening programs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Technological Reciprocity with a Cell Phone.Stacey O. Irwin - 2014 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 18 (1/2):10-19.
Genetic dissent and individual compromise.David Haig - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (2):233-239.
Support for Full Disclosure Up Front.Felicitas Holzer & Ignacio Mastroleo - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (1):3-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-15

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references