Confrontation and Its Discontents
International Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):93-103 (2017)
Abstract
The United States Supreme Court has held that the criminal’s constitutional right of confrontation is not abridged when the defendant is not afforded the opportunity to cross-examine each and every witness offering evidence for the government. This rather surprising contention is investigated through an analysis of the Court’s arguments in light of certain philosophical principles.ISBN(s)
0739-098X
DOI
10.5840/ijap20177780
My notes
Similar books and articles
Confrontation and Its Discontents.Clifton Perry - 2017 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):93-103.
David E. Storey. Naturalizing Heidegger: His Confrontation with Nietzsche, His Contributions to Environmental Philosophy.Ruth Irwin - 2016 - Environmental Philosophy 13 (1):146-149.
Proportionality and the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Clause.Clifton Perry - 2015 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):271-280.
Criminal Responsibility, Intervening Causation and the Right to Die.Clifton B. Perry - 1993 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 8 (1):19-24.
Risk and Public Decision-Making: Social Constructivism and the Postpositivist Challenge.A. L. James Valverde - 1992 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):53-56.
Civility and Its Discontents: Essays on Civic Virtue, Toleration, and Cultural Fragmentation.Michael J. Meyer - 2006 - Social Theory and Practice 32 (3):516-521.
Libertarianism and the Refugees Problem.Jan Narveson - 2017 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):79-87.
Conflicts of Interest, Emoluments, and the Presidency.Fritz Allhoff & Jonathan Milgrim - 2017 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):45-67.
Introduction to Symposium on Democracy.Piero Moraro - 2015 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):103-105.
Libertarianism and Refugees.James P. Sterba - 2017 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):69-77.
Nerds Gone Wild: Can Moore’s Law Remain Valid Indefinitely? [REVIEW]George R. Lucas - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):71-80.
Response to Narveson on the Refugees Problem.James P. Sterba - 2017 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):89-92.
Review of: Lydia B. Amir, Humor and the Good Life in Modern Philosophy: Shaftesbury, Hamann, Kierkegaard. [REVIEW]Luisa de Paula - 2014 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):347-352.
About the Contributors.[author unknown] - 2015 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):165-166.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-08-24
Downloads
3 (#1,314,117)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2017-08-24
Downloads
3 (#1,314,117)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
