A Refutation of Searle's Amended 'Is-Ought' Argument

Analysis 34 (4):133 - 139 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A dilemma for Searle's argument for the connection principle.Kirk Ludwig - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):194-5.
Searle's chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - unknown - Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
The chinese room argument: Consciousness and understanding.Simone Gozzano - 1997 - In Matjaz Gams, M. Paprzycki & X. Wu (eds.), Mind Versus Computer: Were Dreyfus and Winograd Right? Amsterdam: IOS Press. pp. 43--231.
Thought and thought experiments.David Cole - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 45 (May):431-44.
Searle's experiments with thought.William J. Rapaport - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (June):271-9.
What's wrong and right about Searle's chinese room argument?Stevan Harnad - 2001 - In Michael A. Bishop & John M. Preston (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Oxford University Press.
The Role of Kant’s Refutation of Idealism.Ralf M. Bader - 2012 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (1):53-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
101 (#168,750)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references