Common Knowledge 15 (2):157-163 (2009)

This essay introduces the second installment of a symposium in Common Knowledge called “Apology for Quietism.” This introductory piece concerns the sociology of quietism and why, given the supposed quietude of quietists, there is such a thing at all. Dealing first with the “activist” Susan Sontag's attraction to the “quietist” Simone Weil, it then concentrates on the “activist” William Empson's attraction to the Buddha and to Buddhist quietism, with special reference to Empson's lost manuscript Asymmetry in Buddha Faces. The author, who is also editor of the journal, argues against the effort of some contributors to substitute new terms for quietism and emphasizes instead what he calls “the need for repose.”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/0961754x-2008-055
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Galen sotto voce: Meth. Med. 13.6.G. H. R. Horsley - 2013 - Classical Quarterly 63 (2):906-907.


Added to PP index

Total views
15 ( #700,660 of 2,518,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes