Autism beyond pediatrics: Why bioethicists ought to rethink consent in light of chronicity and genetic identity

Bioethics 26 (5):236-241 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Autism is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder that presents unique challenges to bioethicists. In particular, bioethicists ought to reconsider pediatric consent in light of disparity between beliefs that are held about the disorder by parents and adults with autism. The neurodiverse community ought to be given some consideration in this debate, and, as such, there may be a role for autistic narratives in clarifying this problem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autism: Mind and Brain.Uta Frith & Elisabeth L. Hill (eds.) - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Thoughts about the autism label: A parental view.Charlotte Moore - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):493-498.
Reflections on 'autistic integrity'.Barbara Russell - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (3):164-170.
Should we welcome a cure for autism? A survey of the arguments.R. Eric Barnes & Helen McCabe - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):255-269.
Autism and Talent.Francesca Happé & Uta Frith (eds.) - 2010 - Oup/the Royal Society.
Who needs bioethicists?Hallvard Lillehammer - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (1):131-144.
Autism and the "theory of mind" debate.Robert M. Gordon & John A. Barker - 1994 - In George Graham & G. Lynn Stephens (eds.), Philosophical Psychopathology. MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-10

Downloads
28 (#555,203)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references