Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):493-517 (2005)

Authors
Casey Perin
University of California, Irvine
Abstract
The Academics offered an argument from twins or perceptually indiscernible objects and an argument from dreams or madness in support of the indiscernibility thesis: that every true perceptual impression is such that some false impression just like it is possible. I claim that these arguments, unlike modern sceptical arguments, are supposed to establish mere counterfactual rather than epistemic possibilities. They purport to show that for any true perceptual impression j, there are a number of alternative causal histories j might have had which would not have resulted in any change in the way in which j represents its object
Keywords Counterfactual  Indiscernibility  Metaphysics  Object  Perception  World
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2005.00239.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
65 ( #174,294 of 2,498,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes