Beyond Anthropocentrism: Cosmopolitanism and Nonhuman Animals

Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 9 (2):114-133 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


All cosmopolitan approaches to global distributive justice are premised on the idea that humans are the primary units of moral concern. In this paper, I argue that neither relational nor non-relational cosmopolitans can unquestioningly assume the moral primacy of humans. Furthermore, I argue that, by their own lights, cosmopolitans must extend the scope of justice to most, if not all, nonhuman animals. To demonstrate that cosmopolitans cannot simply ‘add nonhuman animals and stir,’ I examine the cosmopolitan position developed by Martha Nussbaum in Frontiers of Justice. I argue that while Nussbaum explicitly includes nonhuman animals within the scope of justice, her account is marked by an unjustifiable anthropocentric bias. I ultimately conclude that we must radically reconceptualise the primary unit of cosmopolitan moral concern to encompass most, if not all, sentient animals.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,685

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomous Pigs.David Judd & James Rocha - 2017 - Ethics and the Environment 22 (1):1-18.
Perpetual Strangers: animals and the cosmopolitan right.Steve Cooke - 2014 - Political Studies 62 (4):930–944.
On possible discontinuities between human and nonhuman minds.Edward A. Wasserman - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):151-152.
Egalitarianism and Animals.Oscar Horta - 2016 - Between the Species 19 (1):108-144.
Cosmopolitan pacifism.Soran Reader - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (1):87 – 103.


Added to PP

41 (#335,621)

6 months
7 (#173,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Angie Pepper
University of Roehampton

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references