Principles of Criminal Liability from the Semiotic Point of View

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 34 (2):561-578 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Certainly principles of criminal liability may be understood as rules or norms outlining orders or prohibitions and standing out among other norms with their weight, for legal culture, legal doctrine, etc. In such a classic approach they are norms defining basic rights and obligations in the applicable criminal law. However, is it the only possible and cognitively interesting meaning of the word “principle” in jurisprudence? From the semiotic point of view, they can occur in three forms: special-kind norms, teleological directives, rules which constitute valid performance of conventional activities. In an extra-directival sense these principles may be understood as models-descriptions of shaping the system of criminal law. From a theoretical and practical point of view principles addressed to the legislator are extremely weighty—they can be called rules constructing the system of criminal liability. These all problems are discussed in the article.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Legal Person in the Criminal Justice of Lituania.Jonas Prapiestis & Agnė Baranskaitė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (1):293-314.
Criminal Liability as a Last Resort (Ultima Ratio): Theory and Reality.Oleg Fedosiuk - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (2):715-738.
Legal and moral responsibility.Antony Duff - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Virtue, Vice and the Criminal Law - A Response to Huigens and Yankah.R. A. Duff - 2013 - In H. H. Lai & A. Amaya (eds.), Law, Virtue and Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing. pp. 195-214.
Origin of the Criminal Liability of Legal Entities (text only in Lithuanian).Romualdas Drakšas - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):189-201.
The philosophy of criminal law: selected essays.Douglas N. Husak - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Indirect Co-Perpetration.Shachar Eldar - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):605-617.
A Theory of Criminal Negligence.Victor Vridar Ramraj - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)


Added to PP

28 (#585,619)

6 months
12 (#241,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michal Peno
Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.
Living Without Free Will.Derk Pereboom - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liberalism, Community, and Culture.Will Kymlicka - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
1. Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1993 - In John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza (eds.), Perspectives on moral responsibility. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. pp. 1-25.

View all 59 references / Add more references