History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (2):165-190 (2011)
AbstractDespite his position as one of the first philosophers to write in the “post- Darwinian” world, the critique of Darwin by Friedrich Nietzsche is often ignored for a host of unsatisfactory reasons. I argue that Nietzsche’s critique of Darwin is important to the study of both Nietzsche’s and Darwin’s impact on philosophy. Further, I show that the central claims of Nietzsche’s critique have been broadly misunderstood. I then present a new reading of Nietzsche’s core criticism of Darwin. An important part of Nietzsche’s response can best be understood as an aesthetic critique of Darwin, reacting to what he saw as Darwin having drained life of an essential component of objective aesthetic value. For Nietzsche, Darwin’s theory is false because it is too intellectual, because it searches for rules, regulations, and uniformity in a realm where none of these are to be found – and, moreover, where they should not be found. Such a reading goes furthest toward making Nietzsche’s criticism substantive and relevant. Finally, I attempt to relate this novel explanation of Nietzsche’s critique to topics in contemporary philosophy of biology, particularly work on the evolutionary explanation of culture.
Similar books and articles
Nietzsche and Darwin.Jean Gayon - 1999 - In Jane Maienschein & Michael Ruse (eds.), Biology and the Foundation of Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 154--197.
Nietzsche for beginners.Marc Sautet, Patrick Roussignac & Rupert Griffin - 1995 - Sophia 34 (2):105-106.
Santayana's critique of modern philosophy and its application to the work of Nietzsche.Matthew Caleb Flamm - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):266-278.
Nietzsche contra Darwin.John Richardson - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (3):537-575.
Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality.Friedrich Nietzsche - 1997  - Cambridge University Press.
Nietzsche: Truth and Redemption: Critique of the Postmodernist Nietzsche.Ted Sadler - 1995 - Athlone Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
“Unnatural” thoughts? On moral enhancement of the human animal.Norman K. Swazo - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (3):299-310.
Embodied cognition and science criticism: juxtaposing the early Nietzsche and Ingold’s anthropology.Theresa Schilhab - 2017 - Biosemiotics 10 (3):469-476.
References found in this work
Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life.Eva Jablonka, Marion J. Lamb & Anna Zeligowski - 2005 - Bradford.
The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.S. J. Gould & R. C. Lewontin - 1979 - In E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. The Mit Press. Bradford Books. pp. 73-90.
Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.David L. Hull - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):435-438.
Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior.Daniel C. Dennett - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):540-543.