Informed consent and deafness in South Africa: Guidelines for clinicians and researchers

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 10 (2):58-62 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Persons with severe to profound hearing loss are potentially vulnerable participants in research trials. Standard enrolment practices are likely to threaten or limit the process of informed consent. Misconceptions held by the hearing community about hearing loss and the impact of amplification of hearing, as well as on the nature of signed language, may jeopardise the process. This is particularly the case in the complex sociopolitical context of South Africa, which has significantly influenced the educational and linguistic status of deaf persons. This paper describes factors of importance, and suggests a number of guidelines for researchers using deaf participants. The paper will highlight some relevant dimensions of deafness to take into account, and the impact of socioeconomic context on this issue. Three case examples will be used to illustrate the complexities of the issues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critical issues on informed consent in Africa.Cletus Andoh - 2008 - Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):109-123.
A Puzzle about Consent in Research and in Practice.Eric Chwang - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (3):258-272.
Psychological Development of Deaf Children.Marc Marschark - 1993 - Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-07

Downloads
2 (#1,780,599)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Catherine Penn
Università degli Studi Roma Tre

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references