- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Bioethics at century's turn: Can normative ethics be retrieved?
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):655 – 675 (2000)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractMy notes
Similar books and articles
Constructing Empirical Bioethics: Foucauldian Reflections on the Empirical Turn in Bioethics Research. [REVIEW]Richard E. Ashcroft - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (1):3-13.
Normative ethics: back to the future.Thomas Hurka - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
On the possibility of a pragmatic discourse bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the normative logic of bioethical inquiry.Elizabeth F. Cooke - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):635 – 653.
The limited relevance of analytical ethics to the problems of bioethics.Robert L. Holmes - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):143-159.
Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice and the "empirical turn" from normative bioethics.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2005 - BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-9.
Observing bioethics.Renée C. Fox - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Judith P. Swazey & Judith C. Watkins.
‘Nobody tosses a dwarf!’ The relation between the empirical and the normative reexamined.Carlo Leget, Pascal Borry & Raymond de Vries - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (4):226-235.
The Philosophy of Medicine Reborn: A Pellegrino Reader.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 2008 - University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt & Fabrice Jotterand.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
79 (#207,331)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
2009-01-28
Downloads
79 (#207,331)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Secular Clinical Ethicists Should Not Be Neutral Toward All Religious Beliefs: An Argument for a Moral-Metaphysical Proceduralism.Abram L. Brummett - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):5-16.
Bioethics as biopolitics.Jeffrey P. Bishop & Fabrice Jotterand - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3):205 – 212.
Defending secular clinical ethics expertise from an Engelhardt-inspired sense of theoretical crisis.Abram Brummett - 2022 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 43 (1):47-66.
What is the appropriate role of reason in secular clinical ethics? An argument for a compatibilist view of public reason.Abram Brummett - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (2):281-290.
Philosophical Failure and the Reasonability View of Conscientious Objection: Can Reason Adjudicate Metaphysical or Religious Claims?Abram L. Brummett - 2023 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (1):12-20.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo