Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology, by Rik Peels, New York, Oxford University Press, 2017: A Précis of Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology [Book Review]

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (4):601-643 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It will not come as a surprise to the reader that in my book Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology (Peels 2017), I defend an account of responsible belief. That the International...

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/09672559.2018.1511146

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology.Rik Peels - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA.
Derivative Differential Responsibility: A Reply to Peels.Benjamin Rossi - 2018 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):139-151.
Review of Rik Peels' Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology. [REVIEW]Gunnar Björnsson - 2017 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 201710.
Rik Peels, Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology. [REVIEW]Robert J. Hartman - 2018 - Ethics 128 (3):646-651.
Why responsible belief is blameless belief.Anthony Robert Booth & Rik Peels - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (5):257-265.
Belief-Policies Cannot Ground Doxastic Responsibility.Rik Peels - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (3):561-569.
Some Metaphysical Implications of a Credible Ethics of Belief.Nikolaj Nottelmann & Rik Peels - 2013 - In New Essays on Belief: Constitution, Content and Structure. New York: Palgrave. pp. 230-250.
Jonathan Matheson, Rico Vitz : The Ethics of Belief: Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-968652-0, 253 pages, £45.00.Katherine E. Furman - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):1105-1106.
Reconciling reason and religion: A response to peels.Brian Zamulinski - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (1):109-113.
Responsible belief and epistemic justification.Rik Peels - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2895-2915.
Précis of "A Virtue Epistemology" (Oxford University Press, 2007).Ernest Sosa - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):107 - 109.
Reconciling reason and religion: A response to peels: Brian Zamulinski.Brian Zamulinski - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (1):109-113.
The ethics of belief.Andrew Chignell - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A paraconsistent theory of belief revision.Edwin D. Mares - 2002 - Erkenntnis 56 (2):229 - 246.
Justified belief as responsible belief.Richard Foley - 2013 - In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Blackwell. pp. 313--26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-02

Downloads
30 (#519,519)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rik Peels
VU University Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 2003 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology.Rik Peels - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA.
Responsibility - The Epistemic Condition.Philip Robichaud & Jan Willem Wieland (eds.) - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references