Assertoric content, responsibility, and metasemantics

Mind and Language 37 (5):914-932 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I argue that assertoric content functions as a means for us to track the responsibilities undertaken by communicators, and that distinctively assertoric commitments are distinguished by being generated directly in virtue of the words the speaker uses. This raises two questions: (a) Why are speakers responsible for the content thus generated? (b) Why is it important for us to distinguish between commitments in terms of their manner of generation? I answer the first question by developing a novel responsibility based metasemantics. I answer the second by reference to the conflicting pressures governing the resources we have available for appraising speech.

Similar books and articles

On the Alleged Gap between Semantic Content and Objects of Assertion.Una Stojnic - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 53:153-158.
Stalnaker’s assertoric contents.Cem Şişkolar - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (1):48-67.
A Bridge from Semantic Value to Content.Brian Rabern - 2017 - Philosophical Topics 45 (2):181-207.
From Meaning to Content.François Recanati - 2018 - In Derek Ball & Brian Rabern (eds.), The Science of Meaning: Essays on the Metatheory of Natural Language Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Distance Between “Here” and “Where I Am”.Savas L. Tsohatzidis - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Research 40:13-21.
Propositions and Multiple Indexing.Brian Rabern - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):116-124.
Colouring, multiple propositions, and assertoric content.Eva Picardi - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):49-71.
?!.Michael Schmitz - manuscript
Utterance content, speaker’s intentions and linguistic liability.Claudia Picazo Jaque - 2017 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 32 (3):329-345.


Added to PP

431 (#43,718)

6 months
107 (#35,605)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Peet
Umeå University

Citations of this work

Assertion.Peter Pagin - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Assertion.Peter Pagin & Neri Marsili - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Deciding What We Mean.Andrew Peet - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Literal Meaning.François Récanati - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 65 references / Add more references