Parliament as a form of social and political representation of interests

Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (23):58-63 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essence of Parliament as an institution of social and political representation of interests is analyzed. The stages of development of the institution of parliamentary practice in the context of the transformation of popular representation and its theoretical basis are proposed. The main functions of Parliament as an institution representing the interests in modern society are highlighted. One of the main institutional formation and development of democracy and civil society is to ensure broad representation across the spectrum of social interests, existing in a society that lays the foundation of a stable political system and provides legitimate participation in public life and public affairs people. The key institution in the provision of such acts Parliament as the supreme representative body of the government, expressing the opinion of the nation. Since its inception, the parliament in one form or another has always been a form of institutional reflection of social interests, although the degree of change in the representation of various historical periods and influenced by political events. Thus, the formation and development of parliaments as representative bodies is a natural consequence of the political development of the countries of Western Europe. In fact, today the Parliament in the political systems of the developed countries, as a mediator between society and the government, serves as a buffer area and the articulation of diverse social interests at the state level.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The emergence and development of the idea of political representation in the political thought of Western Europe.D. Medyanyk - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (22):213-217.
Parliamentary immunity: Protecting democracy or protecting corruption?Simon Wigley - 2003 - Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (1):23–40.
Representation.J. L. Stocks - 1931 - Philosophy 6 (24):405 - 421.
Main approaches to the concept of professionalization policy.Z. Svyryd - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (22):261-265.
Condorcet’s Democratic Theory of Representative Government.Nadia Urbinati - 2004 - European Journal of Political Theory 3 (1):53-75.
Political institutions of modern representative democracy.V. Kozma - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (23):29-33.
The influence of domestic political conflicts on the foreign policy of Ukraine.A. Trutenko - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (23):209-215.
Parliamentarism, From Burke to Weber.William Selinger - 2019 - Cambridge University Press.
Elections as the attribute of democracy.M. Buchin - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (23):39-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-16

Downloads
1 (#1,884,204)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?