AbstractThere is a difference between the private and social cost of preserving the past. While it may be privately rational to forget the past, the social cost is significant: we fail to see that Classical political economy is a polemic against racism. The past is a rich source of surprises and debates, and resources on the Web are uniquely suited to teaching such wide-ranging debates. Our ASecret History of the Dismal Science on the web, provides a rich series of windows on the literary and analytical texts, and the artwork, that figured in the debates. Students who read Smith juxtaposed with Whitman, who read the Carlyle-Mill exchange, and who see these images, understand the debate the way a student who reads only the Wealth of Nations, Ricardo's Principles, or John Stuart Mill cannot.
Similar books and articles
For Love of the Other.Tahseen Béa - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:83-204.
Privatising the Past? History and Education Policy in the 1990s.Gary McCulloch - 1997 - British Journal of Educational Studies 45 (1):69 - 82.
The Touch of the Past: Remembrance, Learning, and Ethics.Roger I. Simon - 2005 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Reflections on Teaching Health Care Ethics on the Web.Toby L. Schonfeld - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):481-494.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads