Understanding Omnipotence

Religious Studies 48 (3):403-414 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


An omnipotent being would be a being whose power was unlimited. The power of human beings is limited in two distinct ways: we are limited with respect to our freedom of will, and we are limited in our ability to execute what we have willed. These two distinct sources of limitation suggest a simple definition of omnipotence: an omnipotent being is one that has both perfect freedom of will and perfect efficacy of will. In this paper we further explicate this definition and show that it escapes the standard objections to divine omnipotence.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Omnipotent Beings?Aldo Frigerio & Ciro Florio - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):309-324.
Two Omnipotent Beings?Ciro De Florio & Aldo Frigerio - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):309-324.
Mavrodes on omnipotence.Bruce R. Reichenbach - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (2):211 - 214.
Omniscience and maximal power.Thomas Metcalf - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (3):289-306.
The Problem of Omnipotence and God's Ability to Sin.David Scott Faber - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
A new cosmological argument.Richard M. Gale & Alexander R. Pruss - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (4):461-476.


Added to PP

511 (#38,664)

6 months
65 (#79,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alexander R. Pruss
Baylor University
Kenneth L. Pearce
James Madison University

Citations of this work

Counterpossibles.Alexander W. Kocurek - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (11):e12787.
Foundational Grounding and the Argument from Contingency.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8.
Two challenges for 'no-norms' theism.James Reilly - 2023 - Religious Studies 59 (4):775-782.
Giving up omnipotence.Scott Hill - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):97-117.
Theism and Secular Modality.Noah Gordon - 2023 - Dissertation, University of Southern California

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
Objects and Persons.Trenton Merricks - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Finkish dispositions.David Kellogg Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):143-158.

View all 22 references / Add more references