Hume's Recantation of His Theory of Personal Identity

Hume Studies 30 (2):257-264 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am going to defend a diagnosis of Hume’s recantation that I have already defended—rather unsuccessfully—in more than one publication. My excuse for trying again is that I shall now offer a more carefully qualified defense. My diagnosis was, and still is, that in the Appendix to the Treatise Hume came to see that he could not account for the necessary ownership of perceptions —i.e., for the fact that this very perception could not have occurred in a different set.

Similar books and articles

The no-self theory: Hume, Buddhism, and personal identity.James Giles - 1993 - Philosophy East and West 43 (2):175-200.
The evident connexion: Hume on personal identity.Galen Strawson - 2011 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
What Was Hume’s Problem with Personal Identity?Abraham Sesshu Roth - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):91-114.
Hume’s Discussion on the Personal Identity.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2005 - Bihar Jounal of Philosophical Research (00):189-197.
Hume on Personal Identity.David Pears - 1993 - Hume Studies 19 (2):289-299.
Personal Identity.John Perry (ed.) - 1975 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
Human Beings Have No Identical Self.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2008 - Proceedings of the 20th Conference of All Orissa Philosophy Association (20):198-210.
Hume's Recantation Revisited.Vijay Mascarenhas - 2001 - Hume Studies 27 (2):279-300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
555 (#31,072)

6 months
95 (#42,389)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Fiction and Content in Hume’s Labyrinth.Bridger Ehli - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (1):187-207.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references