The Five Ways

In Brian Davies & Eleonore Stump (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-131 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I present and evaluate the 5 Ways of St. Thomas Aquinas. I discuss the contentious premises and inferences of the arguments.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Aquinas' five ways.Timothy J. Pawl - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 7--17.
Two Ways of Seeing Ways of Seeing.Timothy Schroeder - 2007 - Dialogue 46 (2):341-345.
Aquinas and the Five Ways.Joseph Owens - 1974 - The Monist 58 (1):16-35.
New ways of ontology – the ways of interaction.Predrag Cicovacki - 2001 - Axiomathes 12 (3-4):159-170.
Ways of Being.Joshua Spencer - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (12):910-918.
Interpreting medicine : forms of knowledge and ways of doing in clinical practice.Cornelius Borck - 2010 - In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Interpretation: Ways of Thinking About the Sciences and the Arts. University of Pittsburgh Press.
On misrepresenting the thomistic five ways.Joseph A. Buijs - 2009 - Sophia 48 (1):15 - 34.
The city and the philosopher: On the urbanism of phenomenology.Eduardo Mendieta - 2001 - Philosophy and Geography 4 (2):203 – 218.
Two ways of reasoning and two ways of arguing in geometry. Some remarks concerning the application of figures in euclidean geometry.Carlos Alvarez - 2003 - Synthese 134 (1-2):289 - 323.
Forbidden ways of life.Ben Colburn - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):618-629.
Philosophy for Children and Other People.William J. Rapaport - 1987 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy (Summer):19-22.
Qualia: They’re Not What They Seem.John Gibbons - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (3):397-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-25

Downloads
150 (#120,086)

6 months
18 (#119,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Pawl
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota

Citations of this work

Saint Thomas Aquinas.Ralph McInerny - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Thomas Aquinas.Ralph McInerny & John O'Callaghan - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Is the God Hypothesis Improbable? A Response to Dawkins.Logan Paul Gage - 2020 - In Kevin Vallier & Joshua Rasmussen (eds.), A New Theist Response to the New Atheists. New York: Routledge. pp. 59-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references