Neutral Free Logic: Motivation, Proof Theory and Models

Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (2):519-554 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Free logics are a family of first-order logics which came about as a result of examining the existence assumptions of classical logic (Hintikka _The Journal of Philosophy_, _56_, 125–137 1959 ; Lambert _Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic_, _8_, 133–144 1967, 1997, 2001 ). What those assumptions are varies, but the central ones are that (i) the domain of interpretation is not empty, (ii) every name denotes exactly one object in the domain and (iii) the quantifiers have existential import. Free logics reject the claim that names need to denote in (ii). _Positive_ free logic concedes that some atomic formulas containing non-denoting names (including self-identity) are true, _negative_ free logic treats them as uniformly false, and _neutral_ free logic as taking a third value. There has been a renewed interest in analyzing proof theory of free logic in recent years, based on intuitionistic logic in Maffezioli and Orlandelli (_Bulletin of the Section of Logic_, _48_(2), 137–158 2019 ) as well as classical logic in Pavlović and Gratzl (_Journal of Philosophical Logic_, _50_, 117–148 2021 ), there for the positive and negative variants. While the latter streamlines the presentation of free logics and offers a more unified approach to the variants under consideration, it does not cover neutral free logic, since there is some lack of both clear formal intuitions on the semantic status of formulas with empty names, as well as a satisfying account of the conditional in this context. We discuss extending the results to this third major variant of free logics. We present a series of G3 sequent calculi adapted from Fjellstad (_Studia Logica_, _105_(1), 93–119 2017, _Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics_, _30_(3), 272–289 2020 ), which possess all the desired structural properties of a good proof system, including admissibility of contraction and all versions of the cut rule. At the same time, we maintain the unified approach to free logics and moreover argue that greater clarity of intuitions is achieved once neutral free logic is conceptualized as consisting of two sub-varieties.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to be R eally Contraction-Free.Greg Restall - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (3):381 - 391.
A More Unified Approach to Free Logics.Edi Pavlović & Norbert Gratzl - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (1):117-148.
Equality-free saturated models.P. Dellunde - 2003 - Reports on Mathematical Logic:3-22.
Free Logic: Selected Essays.Karel Lambert - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Proof theory of modal logic.Heinrich Wansing (ed.) - 1996 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Free Logics are Cut-Free.Andrzej Indrzejczak - 2021 - Studia Logica 109 (4):859-886.
On the Logics of Singular Terms.Richard E. Grandy - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 25 (1):285-296.
Implicational f-structures and implicational relevance logics.A. Avron - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):788-802.
Implicational F-Structures and Implicational Relevance Logics.A. Avron - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):788-802.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-25

Downloads
27 (#592,811)

6 months
11 (#244,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Edi Pavlović
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.
Paradoxes and Failures of Cut.David Ripley - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):139 - 164.
Tolerant, Classical, Strict.Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, David Ripley & Robert van Rooij - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):347-385.
An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is.Graham Priest - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):544-545.
Sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 1948 - Philosophical Review 57 (3):209-230.

View all 38 references / Add more references