Know-How and Gradability

Philosophical Review 126 (3):345-383 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Orthodoxy has it that knowledge is absolute—that is, it cannot come in degrees. On the other hand, there seems to be strong evidence for the gradability of know-how. Ascriptions of know-how are gradable, as when we say that one knows in part how to do something, or that one knows how to do something better than somebody else. When coupled with absolutism, the gradability of ascriptions of know-how can be used to mount a powerful argument against intellectualism about know-how—the view that know-how is a species of propositional knowledge. This essay defends intellectualism from the argument of gradability. It is argued that the gradability of ascriptions of know-how should be discounted as a rather superficial linguistic phenomenon, one that can be explained in a way compatible with the absoluteness of the state reported.

Similar books and articles

Contextualism and Gradability.Romy Jaster - 2013 - GAP.8 Proceedings.
Contextualism, comparatives and gradability.Daniel Halliday - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (2):381 - 393.
Comparison Across Domains in Delineation Semantics.Heather Burnett - 2015 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24 (3):233-265.
Why Intellectualism Still Fails.Andreas Ditter - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (264):500-515.
Thick Concepts and Underdetermination.Pekka Väyrynen - 2013 - In Simon Kirchin (ed.), Thick Concepts. Oxford University Press. pp. 136-160.
Knowing how to establish intellectualism.Daniele Sgaravatti & Elia Zardini - 2008 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):217-261.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-17

Downloads
640 (#25,253)

6 months
113 (#31,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carlotta Pavese
Cornell University

Citations of this work

Knowledge-How, Abilities, and Questions.Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1):86-104.
Knowing How.Yuri Cath - 2019 - Analysis 79 (3):487-503.
Know-how as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account.David Löwenstein - 2017 - Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Know-how, action, and luck.Carlotta Pavese - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 7):1595-1617.
Joint know-how.Jonathan Birch - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (12):3329–3352.

View all 54 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Knowledge and practical interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism.Hartry H. Field - 1980 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
The problems of philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - New York: Barnes & Noble.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.

View all 97 references / Add more references