Casuistry as common law morality

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (6):373-389 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article elaborates on the relation between ethical casuistry and common law reasoning. Despite the frequent talk of casuistry as common law morality, remarks on this issue largely remain at the purely metaphorical level. The article outlines and scrutinizes Albert Jonsen and Stephen Toulmin’s version of casuistry and its basic elements. Drawing lessons for casuistry from common law reasoning, it is argued that one generally has to be faithful to ethical paradigms. There are, however, limitations for the binding force of paradigms. The most important limitations—the possibilities of overruling and distinguishing paradigm norms—are similar in common law and in casuistry, or so it is argued. These limitations explain why casuistry is not necessarily overly conservative and conventional, which is one line of criticism to which casuists can now better respond. Another line of criticism has it that the very reasoning from case to case is extremely unclear in casuistry. I suggest a certain model of analogical reasoning to address this critique. All my suggestions to understand and to enhance casuistry make use of common law reasoning whilst remaining faithful to Jonsen and Toulmin’s main ideas and commitments. Further developed along these lines, casuistry can appropriately be called “common law morality.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The priesthood of bioethics and the return of casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):33-49.
Respondeo: Method and content in casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
Getting down to cases: The revival of casuistry in bioethics.John Arras - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):29-51.
New casuistry: what’s new?Theo Van Willigenburg - 1998 - Philosophical Explorations 1 (2):152 – 164.
Casuistry and the Business Case Method.Martin Calkins - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):237-259.
Character as a Safeguard for Journalists Using Case-Based Ethical Reasoning.Sandra L. Borden - 1999 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):93-104.
Critiques of casuistry and why they are mistaken.Carson Strong - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):395-411.
How Jonsen really views casuistry: A note on the abuse of father Wildes.James M. Tallmon - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):103-113.
The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning.Kenneth W. Kemp - 1988 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (1):76-80.
Casuistry, Virtue, and Business Ethics.Martin John Calkins - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Virginia
On the intersection of casuistry and particularism.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (4):307-322.
Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-17

Downloads
72 (#207,597)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Norbert Paulo
University of Salzburg

Citations of this work

Moral Consistency Reasoning Reconsidered.Norbert Paulo - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (1):107-123.
The value alignment problem: a geometric approach.Martin Peterson - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (1):19-28.
The casuistic method of practical ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (5):417-431.
Virtue ethics, situationism and casuistry: toward a digital ethics beyond exemplars.Bastiaan Vanacker - 2021 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 19 (3):345-357.

Add more citations