The Declaration of the United Colonies: America's First Just War Statement

Journal of Military Ethics 14 (1):7-34 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Was the American War for Independence just? In July 1775, a full year before the Declaration of Independence, the colonists argued that they had the right to self-defense. They made this argument using language that accords with what we can broadly call classical just war thinking, based, inter alia, on their claim that their provincial authorities had a responsibility to defend the colonists from British violence. In the 1775 Declaration of the United Colonies, written two months after British troops attacked colonial citizens, such arguments are made. This essay carefully looks at the historical context of the 1775 Declaration, the arguments made by the colonists, and the philosophical and theological underpinnings of those claims, and concludes that the colonists made a compelling argument commensurate with just war thinking

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The idea of rights in the imperial crisis.Craig Yirush - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):82-103.
The American Revolution: Not a Just War.Gregg Frazer - 2015 - Journal of Military Ethics 14 (1):35-56.
Problems in the Bill of Rights of the United States.Su-lan Zhao - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:50-56.
Jefferson, Morality, and the Problem of Slavery.Ari Helo & Peter Onuf - 2003 - The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series 60 (3):583-614.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-16

Downloads
16 (#855,572)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Unvarnished Doctrine: Locke, Liberalism and the American Revolution.Steven M. Dworetz - 1993 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (2):273-280.

Add more references